Ureno-Salazar v. INS

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

JUN 1 1999

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk JOSE LUIS URENO-SALAZAR,

Petitioner, v. No. 99-9517

Petition for Review IMMIGRATION & (No. A30-543-527) NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TACHA , BRORBY , and EBEL , Circuit Judges.

Petitioner moves for a stay of deportation pending petition for review. This case is governed by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant

Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, enacted on September 30, 1996. Under either the permanent rules or transitional rules, petitioner had thirty days from the final order of deportation to file his *

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (stating permanent rule); IIRIRA § 309(c)(4) (stating transitional rule). The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed petitioner’s administrative appeal on January 19, 1999. Petitioner filed his petition for review on May 18, 1999, four months afterward. Petitioner’s petition for review is therefore untimely.

The stay motion and petition for review are DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM