Lynn v. Rogers
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.
A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir. 1965).
This appeal is DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the matter of the COMPLAINT filed by Patrick LYNN, Patrick Lynn v. Charles Rogers Stephen G. Mirakian Linden Appel and Julie St. Peter
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published