Lynn v. Rogers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Lynn v. Rogers, 505 F.3d 1323 (10th Cir. 2007)
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968; 2007 WL 3277120

Lynn v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir. 1965).

This appeal is DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the matter of the COMPLAINT filed by Patrick LYNN, Patrick Lynn v. Charles Rogers Stephen G. Mirakian Linden Appel and Julie St. Peter
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published