U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 2007

Lynn v. Rogers

Lynn v. Rogers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided November 6, 2007 · Hartz, Henry, Tacha
505 F.3d 1323; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968; 2007 WL 3277120 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Lynn v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir. 1965).

This appeal is DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.