United States v. Del Cid-Rendon
Opinion
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Kenet Del Cid-Rendon appeals the sentence imposed after his plea of guilty to *781 charges arising out of a drug conspiracy. He challenges only the substantive reasonableness of the sentence, which was within the advisory guidelines range. Mr. CidRendon argues that his criminal-history category overrepresented his criminal history and that he should not have been treated the same as codefendant Edguar Lizardo-Figueroa, who was described in the presentence report as the other “lieutenant! ]” in the conspiracy. R. Vol. Ill at 18. Mr. Cid-Rendon has not overcome the presumption of reasonableness that we attach to a within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050, 1053-54 (10th Cir. 2006). We therefore AFFIRM his sentence.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, *781 for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenet Del CID-RENDON, Also Known as Rendon Kenet Del Cid, Carlos Leonel and Keneth Leonel, Defendant-Appellant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished