Purkett v. Gates

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit February 25, 2009

Purkett v. Gates, 314 F. App'x 151 (10th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Jenny L. Purkett appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissing her equal-employment-opportunity complaint as untimely. For the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s recommendation, we hold that the judgment below was correct.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jenny L. PURKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert M. GATES, Defendant-Appellee
Status: Unpublished