ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this court has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In 2008, appellant James K. Conkleton, a Colorado state prisoner, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The first claim for relief centered around Conkleton’s participation in a sex offender treatment program. According to Conkleton, his due process rights were violated when *814 he was terminated from the program in 2003 and denied reentry in 2006. In connection with this claim, Conkleton sought a preliminary injunction requiring Defendants to place him in a sex offender treatment program. The district court denied Conkleton’s motion, concluding he failed “to allege facts that demonstrate he is facing immediate and irreparable injury.”

This court reviews the denial of a preliminary injunction under an abuse of discretion standard. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Urban Gorilla, LLC, 500 F.3d 1222, 1226 (10th Cir. 2007). Having reviewed the record, Conkleton’s appellate brief, and the applicable law, we can discern no reversible error by the district court. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), we affirm the district court’s order of January 21, 2009, for substantially the reasons stated therein. Conkleton’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is granted. Conkleton is reminded that he remains obligated to continue making partial payments until his appellate filing fee is paid in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).