U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Cobb

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided May 5, 2010 · Briscoe, Holloway, McKay, Tacha, Kelly, Lucero, Murphy, Hartz, O'Brien, Tymkovich, Gorsuch, Holmes

603 F.3d 1201; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9562; 2010 WL 1783419 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

John M. Hutchins, Hayley Elizabeth Reynolds, Office of the United States Attorney, Denver, CO, Demetra Lambros, Vijay Shanker, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Howard A. Pincus, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Gray (10th Cir. 2015)
United States v. Goudeau (10th Cir. 2010)
United States v. Grayson (10th Cir. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

On February 17, 2010, the court issued an order granting the United States’ Petition For Rehearing En Bane. Having now heard oral argument in the matter, the court, with Judge Hartz dissenting, has voted to vacate the February 17, 2010 order granting rehearing en banc. Consequently, our February 17, 2010 order is VACATED. The original panel opinion remains in effect and the judgment which issued originally on October 26, 2009, is reinstated. See 10th Cir. R. 35.6. The *1202 clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.