ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Billy Joe Winrow, an Oklahoma state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal of his civil-rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various personnel of the Oklahoma Department of Cox-rections. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma ruled that his claims were barred by his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. See *776 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We see no error in the cogent decision by the district court. As we understand Mr. Winrow’s brief on appeal, the essence of his argument is that there were no administrative remedies to pursue because the prison informed him (apparently incorrectly) in its response to a request to staff (RTS) that the matter was the subject of litigation and therefore could not be considered. We reject the argument. First, Mr. Winrow does not explain why he could not have pursued the denial of his RTS by filing a grievance through proper prison procedures. Second, the record establishes that he did not misunderstand the response to his RTS as barring prison administrative remedies; even after that response, he repeatedly submitted grievances and requests to staff (albeit improperly) regarding the same incident.

We AFFIRM the judgment below.