ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Plaintiff appellant Rev. Edward Allan Buck and Suzanne Hanson Hadley Buck filed a pro se complaint under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1986 alleging a conspiracy among defendants to perpetrate various state and federal crimes against them. 1 The district court granted Buck’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. It then proceeded to screen the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), which requires that the court dismiss any claims filed in forma pauperis if they are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Concluding that Buck’s complaint failed to allege any constitutional violation, that any tort claims were not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or its companion statutes, that many of the defendants were absolutely immune from Buck’s claims, and *911 that his allegations did not show the existence of a conspiracy for purposes of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986, the district court dismissed Buck’s complaint as frivolous.

Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 Since the district court’s dismissal turns largely on questions of law, we will review that determination de novo. See Fogle v. Pierson, 435 F.3d 1252, 1259 (10th Cir. 2006). After reviewing the memorandum decision and order dismissing the amended complaint, the record, and the applicable law, we affirm the district court’s order for substantially the reasons stated by that court.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.