ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

After accepting a plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to appeal, Jorge Socrates Sajaropulos-Heraldez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry of a previously removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He was sentenced to 30 months in prison, which was at the low end of the advisory guidelines range determined by the district court, and a term of 24 months’ supervised release. Notwithstanding the appeal waiver, he appealed. The government now has moved to enforce the waiver. See United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

In evaluating a motion to enforce á waiver, we consider “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. Counsel has filed a response stating that Mr. Sajar-opulos-Heraldez does not dispute that his appellate waiver is enforceable under Hahn We invited Mr. Sajaropulos-Heral-dez to file a pro se response, and he has done so, arguing that we should not enforce his plea agreement. However, we find his arguments unpersuasive. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to enforce and DISMISS this matter.