Steele v. Anglo Gold Ashanti/Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mine

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Steele v. Anglo Gold Ashanti/Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mine, 667 F. App'x 299 (10th Cir. 2016)

Steele v. Anglo Gold Ashanti/Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mine

Opinion

*300 ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Robert E. Bacharach, Circuit Judge

The district court dismissed the action without prejudice based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Mr. Steele agrees with the district court’s ruling. Thus, we dismiss the appeal and grant Mr. Steele’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

*

We do not believe oral argument would be helpful. As a result, we are deciding the appeal based on the briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).

This order and judgment does not constitute binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. But the order and judgment may be cited for its persuasive value under Fed. R. App. P. 32.1(a) and 10th Cir. R. 32.1(A).

Reference

Full Case Name
Delbert C. STEELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANGLO GOLD ASHANTI/CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINE, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished