U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Richardson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided March 9, 2017 · Matheson, Bacharach, Phillips

678 F. App'x 783

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter is before us on the appel-lee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance (the “Motion”). The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s order and separate judgment denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in light of the Supreme Court’s decisiqn in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). The appellant Derrick *784 Desean Richardson does not oppose the Motion.

Upon consideration, the Motion is granted. The' judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.