United States v. Rollins
United States v. Rollins
Opinion
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance, in which the government moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s sentencing determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Defendant Shawn La Velle Rollins does not oppose the motion.
*688 Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.