U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Rodriguez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided March 28, 2017 · Matheson, Bacharach, Phillips

683 F. App'x 656

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) letter in which the government informs the court of the Supreme Court decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017), and the defendant’s “Statement Re: Beckles,” in which the defendant states that he “agrees with the Government that Beckles forecloses relief in this case.”

Upon consideration thereof, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.