United States v. Hopkins
United States v. Hopkins
Opinion
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 20, 2018 _________________________________ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 17-1392 (D.C. No. 1:17-CR-00076-PAB-1) TONY CURTIS HOPKINS, (D. Colo.)
Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________
Before MATHESON, McHUGH, and EID, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
Tony Hopkins was convicted of possessing contraband in prison and he was
sentenced to a 30-month term of imprisonment. He entered his guilty plea pursuant
to a plea agreement in which he waived his right to appeal from his sentence. The
Federal Public Defender (FPD) filed a notice of appeal on his behalf. The FPD
subsequently withdrew from representing Mr. Hopkins and this court appointed
Zachary Ives to represent him. The government has now filed a motion to enforce
the appeal waiver in the plea agreement. Mr. Hopkins has stated in his response that
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. he does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, we grant the motion to enforce and
dismiss this appeal.
Entered for the Court Per Curiam
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished