United States v. Mike

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

United States v. Mike

Opinion

FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT April 13, 2018 _________________________________ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. No. 17-2215 (D.C. No. 2:12-CR-01922-WJ-1) ADRIAN MIKE, (D. N.M.)

Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________

Before BRISCOE, MATHESON, and EID, Circuit Judges. _________________________________

Adrian Mike appeals his 24-month term of supervised release imposed

following his second supervised release revocation. The parties agree that the 24-

month term conflicts with 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), and request remand for resentencing.

We agree, vacate the 24-month term of supervised release, and remand to the district

court for resentencing.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Reference

Status
Unpublished