Emrit v. The Grammy Awards on CBS

Appellate Case: 24-1056 Document: 010111095933 Date Filed: 08/16/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT August 16, 2024 _________________________________

Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court RONALD SATISH EMRIT,

Plaintiff - Appellant, v. No. 24-1056 (D.C. No. 1:24-CV-00122-LTB) THE GRAMMY AWARDS ON CBS, d/b/a (D. Colo.) The Recording Academy/National

Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS),

Defendant - Appellee. _________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. _________________________________

Ronald Satish Emrit, proceeding pro se, sued “The Grammy Awards on CBS,” alleging the Los Angeles Chapter of the Grammy Awards ended his membership in 2010 and denied his request to rejoin in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for

*

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Appellate Case: 24-1056 Document: 010111095933 Date Filed: 08/16/2024 Page: 2 failure to state a claim and for improper venue. We review the dismissal de novo. Kay v. Bemis, 500 F.3d 1214, 1217 (10th Cir. 2007). 1

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and for substantially the same reasons stated in the district court’s dismissal order, we affirm. Mr. Emrit provides no basis in this brief for this court to decide otherwise. We deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis because he has not presented any “reasoned, nonfrivolous argument” in support of his appeal. Lister v. Dep't of the Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005). 2

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Scott M. Matheson, Jr. Circuit Judge