United States v. Riddle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

United States v. Riddle

Opinion

Appellate Case: 25-1027 Document: 36 Date Filed: 09/05/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT September 5, 2025 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. No. 25-1027 (D.C. No. 1:23-CR-00051-RMR-1) LEMICH TAJON RIDDLE, (D. Colo.)

Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. ** _________________________________

This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand for

Resentencing, which requests that this court remand this case to the district court for

de novo resentencing of Defendant Lemich Tajon Riddle.

Upon consideration, the joint motion to remand for resentencing is granted.

This matter is remanded to the district court for resentencing of Mr. Riddle and

to conduct any and all proceedings that are necessary and appropriate in accordance

with the parties’ joint motion to remand for resentencing.

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. ** Because this matter is being decided on the parties’ joint motion to remand to the district court, the panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. Appellate Case: 25-1027 Document: 36 Date Filed: 09/05/2025 Page: 2

This appeal is dismissed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished