United States v. Johnson
United States v. Johnson
Opinion
Appellate Case: 25-4144 Document: 16 Date Filed: 12/03/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT December 3, 2025 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 25-4144 (D.C. No. 2:23-CR-00033-DS-1) JOSE LEON JOHNSON, (D. Utah)
Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________
Before BACHARACH, PHILLIPS, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges. ** _________________________________
This matter is before us on the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand for
Resentencing. (Dkt. No. 14.) The parties ask the court to remand this matter to the
district court for resentencing. Upon consideration and review of the record, the court
grants the motion.
The court remands this matter to the district court with instructions to vacate
appellant Jose Leon Johnson’s sentence and to undertake, in its discretion, all
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. ** Because this matter is being decided on the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand for Resentencing, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); (f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. Appellate Case: 25-4144 Document: 16 Date Filed: 12/03/2025 Page: 2
proceedings necessary and appropriate to resentence Mr. Johnson in accord with the
Joint Motion filed in this court and any other proceedings it deems necessary and
appropriate.
The court directs its Clerk to issue the mandate forthwith.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished