Appellate Case: 25-5149 Document: 19 Date Filed: 12/08/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT December 8, 2025 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. No. 25-5149 (D.C. No. 4:24-CR-00378-JDR-1) ADRIAN HATFIELD, (N.D. Okla.)

Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. ** _________________________________

This matter is before us on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. (Dkt. No. 16.)

The parties ask the court to remand this matter to the district court for resentencing.

Upon consideration and review of the record, the court grants the motion.

The court remands this matter to the district court with instructions to vacate

appellant Adrian Hatfield’s sentence and to undertake, in its discretion, all

proceedings necessary and appropriate to resentence Mr. Hatfield in accord with the

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. ** Because this matter is being decided on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); (f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. Appellate Case: 25-5149 Document: 19 Date Filed: 12/08/2025 Page: 2

Joint Motion filed in this court and any other proceedings it deems necessary and

appropriate.

Further, the court denies Mr. Hatfield’s Application for Extension of Time to

File Brief (Dkt. No. 17) as moot.

The court directs its Clerk to issue the mandate forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

2