U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1983

United States v. Samuel Sanchez and Francisco Armendaris

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 16, 1983 · Fay, Vance, Allgood

709 F.2d 1353; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26708 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Robert A. Rosenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant., Frank H. Alvarez, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

In re United States of America, United States of America v. Manuel Blanco Garcia (11th Cir. 1988)
United States v. Francisco Armendaris (11th Cir. 1986)
Thomas C. Pollgreen v. Raymond A. Morris, District Director of the United States Immigration & Naturalization Service (11th Cir. 1985)
Pollgreen v. Morris (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1984)
William Neal Moore v. Charles Balkcom, Warden, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General (11th Cir. 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before FAY and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD * , District Judge. PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing, insofar as the same is addressed to the panel, 1 is DENIED. A review of the record and the briefs, along with statements made by counsel during oral argument, convinces us that it would have been absolutely futile for the appellees to have raised a elaim of duress or coercion in the administrative proceedings.

. Rule 26(F) of our Local Rules provides that, “A suggestion for rehearing en banc will also be treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.