Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1983

United States v. Samuel Sanchez and Francisco Armendaris

United States v. Samuel Sanchez and Francisco Armendaris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 16, 1983 · Fay, Vance, Allgood
709 F.2d 1353; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26708 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Samuel Sanchez and Francisco Armendaris

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before FAY and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD * , District Judge. PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing, insofar as the same is addressed to the panel, 1 is DENIED. A review of the record and the briefs, along with statements made by counsel during oral argument, convinces us that it would have been absolutely futile for the appellees to have raised a elaim of duress or coercion in the administrative proceedings.

1

. Rule 26(F) of our Local Rules provides that, “A suggestion for rehearing en banc will also be treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑