U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1984

United States v. Richard Harry Reeh, Arlington Douglas Sprecher, Theodore Duane Jorden and Michael Ryan

United States v. Richard Harry Reeh, Arlington Douglas Sprecher, Theodore Duane Jorden and Michael Ryan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 24, 1984 · Godbold, Tjo-Flat, Henderson
725 F.2d 633; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25180 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Richard Harry Reeh, Arlington Douglas Sprecher, Theodore Duane Jorden and Michael Ryan

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this marijuana case the district court denied a motion to suppress as evidence the seized marijuana. In the subsequent bench trial defendants were found guilty. After a notice of appeal was filed, defendants filed what the district court deemed a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The district judge certified to this court that he was disposed to grant the motion should this court remand the case in accordance with the procedure approved in U.S. v. Fuentes-Lozano, 580 F.2d 724, 725-26 (5th Cir. 1978) (per curiam).

The case is REMANDED to the district court for its ruling on the motion for new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.