U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1984

William Anthony Brooks v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 15, 1984 · Godbold, Ro-Ney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Henderson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark

728 F.2d 1358; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24499 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant., Mary Beth Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent (11th Cir. 1985)
Richard Tucker v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent (11th Cir. 1985)
Warren McCleskey Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Cross-Appellee (11th Cir. 1985)
Lesko v. Lehman (3d Cir. 1991)
Lesko v. Lehman (3d Cir. 1991)
Claude W. Albert, Jr. v. Charles M. Montgomery (11th Cir. 1984)
Van Roosevelt Solomon v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center (11th Cir. 1984)
David Jarrell v. Charles Balkcom, Warden (11th Cir. 1984)
Stephens v. Kemp (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.