U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1985

United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes

United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 30, 1985 · Godbold, Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Henderson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark
753 F.2d 927; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28071 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.