U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1985

United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery

United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 12, 1985 · Roney, Clark, Simpson
767 F.2d 1494; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21207 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery

Opinion

*1495 PER CURIAM:

On petition for panel rehearing, appellant Arthur Avery urges that we failed to analyze the prosecutor’s alleged improper vouching remarks in the context of the entire trial as required by United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Even assuming the prosecutor’s remarks exceeded permissible bounds, we would still conclude that any error was harmless. United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1045 n. 10, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985).

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by appellant Arthur B. Avery, Sr., filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.