U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1986

Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company

Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 6, 1986 · Godbold, Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Henderson
798 F.2d 1355 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Joel D. Eaton, Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant., Gerry S. Gibson, Steel Hector & Davis, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

By the Court:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.