U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1986

Wolfe v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 28, 1986 · Clark, Fay, Godbold, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance

784 F.2d 1061; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23161 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Keith Olin, Bennett Falk, Ruden Barnett McClosky Schuster & Russell P.A., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants., Elmo R. Hoffman, Orlando, Fla., for Wolfe., Karen A. Gievers, Anderson Moss Russo Gievers & Cohen, P.A., Miami, Fla., for Gorman.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.