U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1986

Balogh's of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Getz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 14, 1986 · Anderson, Clark, Fay, Godbold, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance

785 F.2d 895 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Joel D. Eaton, Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A. Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants., David L. Ross, Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quental & Wolff, P.A., Miami, Fla., for Getz/Mayor’s., Brian F. Speetor, Kenny Nachwalter & Seymour, P.A., Miami, Fla., and Stephen Ruffino, Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, Donald J. Williamson, John F. Flaherty, New York City, for Rolex.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Balogh's Of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Getz (11th Cir. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.