U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1986

Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.

Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 14, 1986 · Anderson, Clark, Fay, Godbold, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Tuttle, Vance
785 F.2d 896 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Ralph H. Yeilding, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Scott M. Phelps, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants., Joseph W. Letzer, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr & Murray, Janet L. Humphreys, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral *897argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.