U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1986

Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 27, 1986 · Anderson, Clark, Fay, Godbold, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Ney, Tjoflat, Vance
791 F.2d 833 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Dennis K. Larry, Donald H. Partington, Pensacola, Fla., Edward R. Curtis, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant., Joseph W. Womack, R. Benjamin Reid, Miami, Fla., Robert P. Gaines, Joe J. Harrell, Pensacola, Fla., for defendants-appel-lees., Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; Winston E. Arnow, Judge.

Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active serving having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above-consolidated causes shall be reheard by this Court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.