U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1987

Larry Eugene Mann v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 10, 1987 · Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson

828 F.2d 1498; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17668 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Larry H. Spalding, Office of Capital Collateral Representative, Michael A. Mello, Mark Evan Olive, Billy H. Ñolas, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellant., Michael Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen., Gary Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Broadnax v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2000)
Wilson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
McWhorter v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
Minor v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
Hagood v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1998)
Travis v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1997)
Price v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1997)
Taylor v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)
Jackson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
Smith v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
Larry Eugene Mann v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent (11th Cir. 1988)
Combs v. State (Fla. 1988)
Grossman v. State (Fla. 1988)
Foster v. State (Fla. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion May 14, 1987, 11th Cir., 1987, 817 F.2d 1471)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of October 19, 1987, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.