U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1987

United States v. One Lear Jet Aircraft, Serial No. 35a-280, Registration No. Yn-Bvo, Leybda Corp., Claimant-Appellant

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 2, 1987 · Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson

831 F.2d 221; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17736 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Ira J. Kurzban, Kurzban, Kurzban & Weinger, P.A., Miami, Fla., for claimant-appellant., Leon B. Kellner, U.S. Atty., Jonathan Goodman, David O. Leiwant, Sonia Escobio O’Donnell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. One Lear Jet Aircraft, Serial No. 35a-280, Registration No. Yn-Bvo, Leybda Corp., Claimant-Appellant (11th Cir. 1988)
Robert W. Tuszkiewicz v. Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. (7th Cir. 1998)
Counts v. American General Life & Accident Insurance (11th Cir. 1997)
J.W. Counts v. American General Life And Accident Insurance Company (11th Cir. 1997)
Doe v. United States (Court of Claims 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

On the court’s own motion, a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of hearing the captioned appeal in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this case shall be heard by this court in banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The order entered on March 2, 1987, denying rehearing in banc is accordingly VACATED. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.