U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1987

Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp.

Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 8, 1987 · Allgood, Fay, Kravitch
826 F.2d 1024; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11954 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James M. Thompson, Savannah, Ga., Joseph J. Blake, Jr., Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, Greenville, S.C., for Synalloy Corp., James B. Hiers, Jr., Donald F. Daugherty, Atlanta, Ga., for General Acc., David B. Higdon, Thomas F. Richardson, Macon, Ga., for Fidelity & Cas., Ronald D. Reemsnyder, Atlanta, Ga., for First State., John W. Winborne III, Atlanta, Ga., for Midland Ins., Thomas E. McCarter, David A. Handley, Michael W. Higgins, Atlanta, Ga., for Continental Cas. Co., F. Taylor Putney, Jr., John D. Jones, Atlanta, Ga., for American Mut., J. Robert Persons, Atlanta, Ga., for Affiliated FM Ins., Richard R. Mehrhof, Jr., Augusta, Ga., for Stonewall Ins., Daniel Reinhardt, Atlanta, Ga., James McGuire, New York City, for Lloyds of London., Charles C. Stebbins III, Augusta, Ga., for Columbia Cas.

Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Synalloy Corporation appeals from a final order in a declaratory judgment action entered in favor of Continental Casualty Company and dismissing all claims for damages against Synalloy’s other insurers. After carefully reviewing the district court’s analysis in this complex insurance case, we find that it is sound and in accordance with the law. We therefore affirm on the basis of the district court orders. See Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1550 (S.D.Ga. 1985) and *1025Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1563 (S.D.Ga. 1986). Having affirmed the rulings of the district court, the cross appeal of Continental Casualty Company is moot and hereby DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.