U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1987

Wolfe v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 15, 1987 · Clark, Edmondson, Fay, Godbold, Hatchett, Henderson, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance

827 F.2d 695; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12258 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Keith Olin, Bennett Falk, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants., Parker, Johnson, Owen & McGuire, Elmo R. Hoffman, Orlando, Fla., Greenfield & Chimicles, E. Stirling Lathrop, Haverford, Pa., for plaintiffs-appellees., Albert J. Beveridge, III, John S. Guttmann, Robert H. Singletary, Jr., Beveridge & Diamond, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Werner Heierli.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,585 Frederick J. Wolfe and Heather B. Wolfe, His Wife v. E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc. And Peter Panos (11th Cir. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3205, 96 L.Ed.2d 692, the district court’s judgment is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings in light of Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.