U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1987

Reshard v. Britt

Reshard v. Britt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 6, 1987 · Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance
831 F.2d 222 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Connie Reshard, pro se., Richard B. Collins, Collins, Dennis & Williams, Tallahassee, Fla., for Dr. Earl Britt., Richard Smoak, Sale, Brown & Smoak, Panama City, Fla., for Dr. George Bonk., P. Scott Mitchell, Fuller & Johnson, Tallahassee, Fla., for Dr. David Moore., William H. Davis, Wadsworth & Davis, Tallahassee, Fla., for Tallahassee Community Hosp.

Reshard v. Britt

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.