U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1988

United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey

United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 8, 1988 · Kravitch, Johnson, Edmondson
846 F.2d 707; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7701; 1988 WL 49838 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Thomas E. Harrison, Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellant., J.B. Sessions, III, U.S. Atty., Donna B. Roberts, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

[1,2] The robbery of a bankteller at gunpoint is an act of “force and violence” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 2113(a). The evidence in this case is sufficient to support defendant’s convictions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(a) and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(d).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.