U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1988

Walter G. Dedge, Jr. v. Steve Kendrick

Walter G. Dedge, Jr. v. Steve Kendrick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 21, 1988 · Hill, Vance, Clark
849 F.2d 1398; 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 899; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9836; 1988 WL 66968 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Julius F. Parker, Jr., Parker, Skelding, McYoy & Labasky, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant., Joseph R. Moss, Cocoa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Walter G. Dedge, Jr. v. Steve Kendrick

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant, Steve Kendrick, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(2), the district court is required to enter an order limiting the time to file and hear motions. In this case, the district court entered an order requiring that motions for summary judgment be filed by October 30, 1987. The defendant filed his motion for summary judgment on December 7, 1987. Therefore, the district court properly denied the motion as untimely, and we need not address the merits of the motion in this appeal. See United States Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff, 768 F.2d 1099, 1104 (9th Cir. 1985).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.