U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1988

United States v. Julio Piccinonna

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 28, 1988 · Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Cox

861 F.2d 639; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18654; 1988 WL 126916 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James W. McDonald, Jr., McDonald & Erickson, P.A., Homestead, Fla., for defendant-appellant., Dexter W. Lethinen, U.S. Atty., Caroline Heck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., John J. Powers, III, Dept, of Justice, Main, Appellate Section, Laura Heiser, Washington, D.C., James Griffin, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Anti Trust Div., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion August 28, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 858 F.2d 743).

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.