Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1988

Ross v. Bank South, N.A.

Ross v. Bank South, N.A.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 10, 1988 · Clark, Cox, Fay, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance
848 F.2d 1132; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9693 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William J. Cobb, Kocher, Wilson, Kor-schun & Cobb, H. Marshall Korschun, Atlanta, Ga., for Jack Hereth., William H. Mills, Redden, Mills & Clark, L. Drew Redden, Birmingham, Ala., for Weldon, Rogers, Blanton, Lee & Moffett., Herbert P. Schlanger, Atlanta, Ga., for Alan 0. Jones., Robert Wyeth Lee, Jr. Wininger & Lee, Birmingham, Ala., for R. Davidson., Kirk M. McAlpin, Jr., Peterson, Young, Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for Peter Orr & Robinson-Hall., Michael L. Edwards, Balch & Bingham, C. William Gladden, Birmingham, Ala., for Laventhol & Horwatch., James W. Gewin, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Jay St. Clair, Birmingham, Ala., for Alston & Bird, et al., Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, John E. Grenier, Charles C. Pinckney, Sally S. Reilly, Birmingham, Ala., for Arthur Rice., Stephen E. Hudson, Kilpatrick & Cody, Debbie W. Harden, Thomas H. Christopher, Jerre B. Swan, Atlanta, Ga., for Bank South., Charles Cleveland, Cleveland & Cleveland, Robert Wiggins, Gordon, Silberman, Wiggins & Childs, Birmingham, Ala., R. Alan Stotsenburg, David C. Harrison, New York City, for Ross & Miller., Robert Dean Pope, President, National Ass’n of Bond Lawyers, Richmond, Va., Robert E. Hicks, Hicks, Maloof & Campbell, Atlanta, Ga., amicus curiae.

Ross v. Bank South, N.A.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision. The 4 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion February 17, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 837 F.2d 980)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, *1133KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, CLARK and COX, Circuit Judges*. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court,in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of October 17, 1988, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.