Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1989

William Alvin Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellant

William Alvin Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 2, 1989 · Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Cox
873 F.2d 253; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7478; 1989 WL 47910 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Stephen H. Glickman, Auckerman, Spae-der, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker, Washington, D.C., and Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant, cross-appellee., Dennis R. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee, cross-appellant.

William Alvin Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellant

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion August 26, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 855 F.2d 712)

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 5, 1989, on a date hearafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.