U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1989

In the Matter of a & B Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. A & B Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 31, 1989 · Hill, Hatchett, Henderson

878 F.2d 1311; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11235; 1989 WL 74345 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Virginia M. Covington, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla.,, Gary D. Gray, Wynette J. Hewett, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Roger M. Olsen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Michael L. Paup, Chief, Appellate Section, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant., Patti W. Medearis, Straske, Farfante, Se-gall & Arcuri, Tampa, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service v. Stanmock, Inc. (In re Stanmock, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 1989)
United States v. Kare Kemical, Inc. (In re Kare Kemical, Inc.) (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

HILL, Circuit Judge:

As contemplated in the judgment of the court in this case, United States v. A & B Heating & Air Conditioning, 861 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir. 1988), the court has been notified by both parties that the Bankruptcy Court presiding over the appellee’s Chapter 11 case has granted appellee’s motion to amend the plan of reorganization by deleting the designation of tax payments provision. This action satisfies the concerns of the court. The case is REMANDED to the District court to be dismissed as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.