U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1989

United States v. Hollmann Suarez

United States v. Hollmann Suarez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 18, 1989 · Tjoflat, Hatchett, Morgan
885 F.2d 1574; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15791; 1989 WL 113063 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Edward R. Shohat (Court-appointed), Pamela I. Perry, Bierman, Shohat & Loey, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant., J. Michael Faulkner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Thomas E. Booth, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

United States v. Hollmann Suarez

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal, appellant challenges the district court's decision denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons given by the district court in its order overruling appellant’s motion, which is reported at 694 F.Supp. 926 (S.D.Ga. 1988), we find no error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.