Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit September 28, 1989

Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co., 888 F.2d 731 (11th Cir. 1989)

1989 WL 127592

Anderson, Clark, Cox, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion April 6, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 868 F.2d 1578)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these consolidated cases shall be decided by this court in banc. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs.

The previous panel opinion is hereby VACATED.

Reference

Full Case Name: William T. DUNN d/b/a Tom's Amusement Company and Tom's Amusement Company, Inc. v. BLUE RIDGE TELEPHONE COMPANY, Jones Vending Company, Inc.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published