U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1989

Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 28, 1989 · Anderson, Clark, Cox, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Roney, Tjoflat, Vance

888 F.2d 731; 1989 WL 127592 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Trammell E. Vickery, James A. Gilbert, and H. Quigg Fletcher, III, Hansell & Post, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants., R. Leslie Waycaster, Jr., Waycaster, Corn & Murray, Dalton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Tapley v. Collins (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion April 6, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 868 F.2d 1578)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these consolidated cases shall be decided by this court in banc. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs.

The previous panel opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.