Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1990

In re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant

In re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 21, 1990 · Tjoflat, Fay, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Cox, Birch
904 F.2d 1498; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9982; 1990 WL 83997 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Dexter W. Lehtinen, U.S. Atty., Mayra Reyler Lichter, Michael P. Sullivan and Linda C. Hertz, Asst. U.S. Attys., for movant-appellant., Arthur J. Berger, Miami, Fla., for witness-appellee Sam Rabin., Robert G. Amsel and Jeffrey S. Weiner, Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross, Miami, Fla., for amicus curiae.

In re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

On April 30, 1990, the grand jury for the Southern District of Florida issued a new subpoena identical to the subpoena that gave rise to this case. Appellee has fully complied with the new subpoena.

Appellee now moves to dismiss this appeal as moot, and appellant joins in the motion. The panel opinion, published at 896 F.2d 1267, has already been vacated by our order of May 16,1990, granting rehearing en banc. The panel opinion will remain vacated, the judgment of the district court, 717 F.Supp. 1502, is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions that the case be dismissed. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.