U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1990

Reliance Insurance Company-Counterclaim v. The Kent Corporation, Inc.-Counterclaim

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 31, 1990 · Tjoflat, Clark, Smith

909 F.2d 424; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13441; 1990 WL 107986 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Tom E. Ellis, Kracke, Thompson & Ellis, P.C., Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-counterclaim-plaintiff-appellant., Lyman H. Harris and Lonette Lamb Berg, Harris, Evans & Downs, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-counterclaim-defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Haman, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1998)
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp. (Kan. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Because this case has been settled, the parties have moved to dismiss the petition for rehearing filed by appellee. Accordingly, the panel opinion published at 896 F.2d 501 (11th Cir. 1990) is vacated. The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions that the case be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.