U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1990

United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 23, 1990 · Anderson, Clark, Cox, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Johnson, Kravitch, Tjoflat

902 F.2d 24 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Frank W. Donaldson, U.S. Atty., James D. Ingram, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant., John W. Kelly, Sikes & Kelly, Selma, Ala., for claimant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties (11th Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of October 8, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.