U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1991

Consolidated Gas Co. Of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Company of Florida, a Florida Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 24, 1991 · Anderson, Cox, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Johnson, Kravitch, Tjoflat

931 F.2d 710; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11035; 1991 WL 68669 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James J. Kenny, Scott E. Perwin, Michael Nachwalter, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant., Sylvia H. Walbolt, Tampa, Fla., for ami-cus curiae Florida Power., William H. Harrold, Tallahassee, Fla., for amicus curiae Florida Pub. Serv. Com’n., James R. Atwood, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Florida Power & Light., Philip A. Allen, III, Edward T. O’Donnell, William J. Dunaj, Teresa Ragatz, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee., James R. McGibbon, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, Ga., and Sutherland, As-bill & Brennan, Washington, D.C., for ami-cus curiae Union Carbide.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta (9th Cir. 2025)
Clark Memorials of Alabama Inc. v. SCI Alabama Funeral Services LLC (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2014)
Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp. (11th Cir. 2002)
Covad Communications Company v. Bellsouth Corporation (11th Cir. 2002)
Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp. (11th Cir. 2002)
Aquatherm Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1997)
U.S. Philips Corporation v. Windmere Corporation (Fed. Cir. 1992)
U.S. Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corp. (Fed. Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judges. *

ORDER:

Pursuant to the order issued by the United States Supreme Court on March 18, 1991, City Gas Co. of Fla. v. Consolidated Gas Co. of Fla., — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1300, 113 L.Ed.2d 235 (1991), vacating the judgment of the en banc court, Consolidated Gas Co. of Fla. v. City Gas Co. of Fla., 912 F.2d 1262 (11th Cir. 1990), the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered on August 14, 1987, and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on July 24, 1987, are vacated and the cause is remanded with instructions to enter an order dismissing the case with prejudice. Since the decision of the en banc court, the parties have reached a settlement and the case, therefore, is moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.