U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1991

United States v. Donald Teague

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 17, 1991 · Tjoflat, Fay, Krávitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina

932 F.2d 899; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10460; 1991 WL 81674 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William A. Morrison, Jones, Morrison & Womack, PC, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant., Michael J. O’Leary, Gerrilyn Brill, Asst. U.S. Attys., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Donald Teague (11th Cir. 1992)
State Of Washington v. Oscar Luis Urbina (Wash. Ct. App. 2019)
State v. Robinson (Wash. 1999)
State v. Robinson (Wash. 1999)
Richard K. Wells, K-2894 v. George Petsock, Superintendent (3d Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*900 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRÁVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.