U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1991

Buddy Nichols, Cross-Appellant v. Mac Sim Butler, Sheriff Don Siegelman, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Cross-Appellees

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 17, 1991 · , Anderson, Birch, Clark, Cox, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Johnson, Kravitch, Tjoflat

932 F.2d 900; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10420; 1991 WL 81676 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert E. Lusk, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for respondents-appellants cross-appellees., Dennis N. Balske, Montgomery, Ala., for petitioner-appellee cross-appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Buddy Nichols, Cross-Appellee v. Mac Sim Butler, Sheriff Don Siegelman, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Cross-Appellants (11th Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.